Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150656›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2024

The importance of electrode-tissue proximity in creating pulsed field ablation lesions: insights from a sub-acute preclinical model.

Nishaki K Mehta, Daniel Pinkhas, Lars M Mattison, Daniel C Sigg, Nicole Kirchhof, Al Patequi, Peter Khalil, David E Haines

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Practical guide on the use of the PulseSelect pulsed field ablation system for atrial fibrillation ablation procedures.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nishaki K Mehta *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Corewell William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA. Nishaki.mehta@corewellhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3992-3609
Daniel Pinkhas *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Corewell William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Lars M MattisonMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Daniel C SiggMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicole KirchhofMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Al PatequiAbbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA.
Peter KhalilDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Corewell William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
David E HainesDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Corewell William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to evaluate the anatomic and functional lesion development over time at different atrial sites immediately following delivery of pulsed field ablation (PFA).

methodsUsing a porcine model, PFA ablations were performed in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrial lateral wall (RA), left atrial appendage (LAA), and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) using four different PFA profiles. Mapping was done sequentially in 5-20-min increments up to 280-min post lesion delivery for low voltage area (LVA) assessment and conduction velocity. Lesion characteristics were noted with voltage mapping immediately post ablation and at the serial time points.

resultsIn 9 animals, 33 sites were ablated. None of the four different profiles across all sites showed any statistical difference on acute lesion formation or persistence. Higher tissue contact was observed in the SVC and RSPV and lower tissue contact was observed in the LAA and RA locations. Higher contact areas were noted to have higher density electroanatomic low voltage area (LVA) (12/14 vs 5/18, p = 0.01) and larger lesions on gross pathology (2 /14 vs 6/16, p = 0.01) compared to lower contact areas. Lesion regression occurred in 16/33 sites. Sustained lesions were significantly more prevalent in higher versus lower contact sites (65% vs 38%, p = 0.037).

conclusionThe development of significant and durable lesions for PFA in a porcine model appears to be dependent on tissue proximity and contact.

Indexed as

AblationAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationElectroporationPulsed field ablation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.