ArticleMetabolic brain disease2024
Integrative analysis reveals key lysosomal genes as potential therapeutic targets in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Metabolic brain disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- β-Asarone Attenuates Neuroinflammation of Alzheimer's Disease by Activating Autophagy and Suppressing NLRP3 Inflammasome Assembly.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- APOE4-Aβ synergy drives brain network dysfunction and neuronal lysosomal-ER proteostasis dysregulation a preclinical Alzheimer's disease model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrated transcriptomic analysis identifies lysosomal autophagy-related genes in sarcopenia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with early autophagy deficits. Our study probed the role of lysosomal-related genes (LRGs) in AD. Using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we analyzed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in AD. AD-related genes and lysosomal-related genes (LRGs) were extracted from public databases. Leveraging the UpSetR package, we identified differentially expressed LRGs (DE-LRGs). Subsequently, consensus cluster analysis was used to stratify AD patients into distinct molecular subtypes based on DE-LRGs. Immune cell patterns were studied via Single-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA). Molecular pathways were assessed through Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), while Mendelian Randomization (MR) discerned potential gene-AD causations. To reinforce our bioinformatics findings, we conducted in vitro experiments. In total, 52 DE-LRGs were identified, with LAMP1, VAMP2, and CTSB as standout hub genes. Leveraging the 52 DE-LRGs, AD patients were categorized into three distinct molecular subtypes. Interestingly, the three aforementioned hub genes exhibited significant predictive accuracy for AD differentiation across the subtypes. The ssGSEA further illuminated correlations between LAMP1, VAMP2, and CTSB with plasma cells, fibroblasts, eosinophils, and endothelial cells. GSVA analysis underscored significant associations of LAMP1, VAMP2, and CTSB with NOTCH, TGFβ, and P53 pathways. Compellingly, MR findings indicated a potential causative relationship between LAMP1, CTSB, and AD. Augmenting our bioinformatics conclusions, in vitro tests revealed that LAMP1 potentially alleviates AD progression by amplifying autophagic processes. LAMP1 and CTSB emerge as potential AD biomarkers, paving the way for innovative therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.