Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150627›Full record

Trial reportEating and weight disorders : EWD2024

Mindfulness-based eating awareness training versus itself plus implementation intention model: a randomized clinical trial.

Mona Jassemi Zergani, Mohammad Hossin Taghdisi, Mohammadreza Seirafi, Saied Malihialzackerin, Habibeh Taghavi Kojidi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mona Jassemi ZerganiDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-3393
Mohammad Hossin TaghdisiPublic Health Department, Faculty of Health and Medical Engineering, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0000-0003-7998
Mohammadreza SeirafiDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. msf_3@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6285-4605
Saied MalihialzackerinDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4702-1004
Habibeh Taghavi KojidiDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-279X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity causes many physical and mental illnesses. This study compares mindfulness-based eating awareness training (MB-EAT) versus MB-EAT plus implementation intention model for effectiveness on body mass index (BMI), weight self-efficacy, and physical activity in obese women with BMIs ≤ 25 (n = 52).

methodsIn this randomized clinical trial, the participants were selected by the simple random sampling method and randomly divided into three groups. A 12-session MB-EAT of 150 min per session was performed for experimental group I. The experimental group II received MB-EAT alone for physical activity planning and MB-EAT plus implementation intention; also, both groups were compared to the control group. Data were measured by the scales, a questionnaire, and a checklist, and the P-values are based on the results of the generalized estimating equation (GEE) test. P < 0.001 were considered the significance level.

resultsThe MB-EAT and MB-EAT + implementation intention effectiveness on the two experimental groups' BMI, weight self-efficacy, and physical activity was significantly different from the control group. In the integrated group versus the MB-EAT group, BMI, physical activity, and physical discomfort, were more effective than the weight self-efficacy subscales. Both intervention groups were effective on BMI, weight self-efficacy, and physical activity, but the integrated group's effectiveness was more.

conclusionsThe MB-EAT effectiveness trial is theory-based, reducing weight and the psychological and behavioral consequences of overweight and obese adults. The MB-EAT + the Implementation intention model is to plan regular and daily exercise according to each individual's specific circumstances.

trial registrationThe trial registration number: (IRCT20200919048767N1).

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexExerciseIntentionMindfulnessObesitySelf EfficacyAdultAwarenessBody WeightEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBehaviorBody mass indexEatingLifestyleMeditationMindfulnessOverweightPhysical activitySelf-controlWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID39150627
PMCPMC11329387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.