ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Harnessing Deep Learning for Accurate Pathological Assessment of Brain Tumor Cell Types.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary diffuse central nervous system large B-cell lymphoma (CNS-pDLBCL) and high-grade glioma (HGG) often present similarly, clinically and on imaging, making differentiation challenging. This similarity can complicate pathologists' diagnostic efforts, yet accurately distinguishing between these conditions is crucial for guiding treatment decisions. This study leverages a deep learning model to classify brain tumor pathology images, addressing the common issue of limited medical imaging data. Instead of training a convolutional neural network (CNN) from scratch, we employ a pre-trained network for extracting deep features, which are then used by a support vector machine (SVM) for classification. Our evaluation shows that the Resnet50 (TL + SVM) model achieves a 97.4% accuracy, based on tenfold cross-validation on the test set. These results highlight the synergy between deep learning and traditional diagnostics, potentially setting a new standard for accuracy and efficiency in the pathological diagnosis of brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.