Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150523›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025

Predicting graft survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients using machine learning.

Gülşah Kaya Aksoy, Hüseyin Gökhan Akçay, Çağlar Arı, Mehtap Adar, Mustafa Koyun, Elif Çomak, Sema Akman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gülşah Kaya AksoyDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. gkayaaksoy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-1581
Hüseyin Gökhan AkçayDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Çağlar ArıDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehtap AdarDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Mustafa KoyunDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Elif ÇomakDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Sema AkmanDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplantation can increase graft survival and reduce mortality. Artificial intelligence modelling enables impartial evaluation of clinician bias. This study aimed to examine factors that affect the survival of grafts in paediatric kidney transplantation through the use of machine learning.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted on records of paediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1994 and 2021 and had post-transplant follow-up > 12 months. The nearest neighbour method was used to impute missing fields from a total of 48 variables in the dataset. Models including Naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), multi-layer perceptron, and XGBoost were trained to predict graft survival. The study used 80% of the patients for training and the remaining 20% for testing. Modelling success was evaluated based on accuracy and F1 score metrics.

resultsThe study analysed 465 kidney transplant recipients. Of these, 56.7% were male. The mean age at transplantation was 12.08 ± 5.01 years. Of the kidney transplants, 73.1% (n = 339) were from living donors, 34.5% (n = 160) were pre-emptive transplants, and 2.2% (n = 10) were second-time transplants. The machine learning model identified several features associated with graft survival, including antibody-mediated rejection (+ 0.7), acute cellular rejection (+ 0.66), eGFR at 3 years (+ 0.43), eGFR at 5 years (+ 0.34), pre-transplant peritoneal dialysis (+ 0.2), and cadaveric donor (+ 0.2). The successes of the logistic regression and SVM models were similar. The F1 score was 91.9%, and accuracy was 96.5%.

conclusionMachine learning can be used to identify factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. By expanding similar studies, risk maps can be created prior to transplantation.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalKidney TransplantationMachine LearningAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft RejectionHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsGraft failureKidney transplantMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.