ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024
Measurement of transcranial Doppler insonation angles from three-dimensional reconstructions of CT angiography scans.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Education Research: Simulator-Based Training in Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Enhancing Competency in a Critical Neuroimaging Tool.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood velocities measured by Transcranial Doppler (TCD) are dependent on the angle between the incident ultrasound beam and the direction of blood flow (known as the Doppler angle). However, when TCD examinations are performed without imaging the Doppler angle for each vessel segment is not known. We have measured Doppler angles in the basal cerebral arteries examined with TCD using three-dimensional (3D) vessel models generated from computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans. This approach produces angle statistics that are not accessible during non-imaging TCD studies. We created 3D models of the basal cerebral arteries for 24 vasospasm patients. Standard acoustic windows were mapped to the specific anatomy of each patient. Virtual ultrasound transmit beams were generated that originated from the acoustic window and intersected the centerline of each arterial segment. Doppler angle measurements were calculated and compiled for each vessel segment. Doppler angles were smallest for the middle cerebral artery M1 segment (median 24.6°) and ophthalmic artery (median 25.0°), and largest for the anterior cerebral artery A2 segment (median 76.4°) and posterior cerebral artery P2 segment (median 75.8°). The ophthalmic artery had the highest proportion of Doppler angles that were less than 60° (99%) while the anterior cerebral artery A2 segment had the lowest proportion of Doppler angles that were less than 60° (10%). These angle measurements indicate the expected deviation between measured and true velocities in the cerebral arteries, highlighting specific segments that may be prone to underestimation of velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.