Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150347›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Professionals' and Intercultural Mediators' Perspectives on Communication With Ukrainian Refugees in the Czech Healthcare System.

Jolana Kopsa Těšinová, Karolína Dobiášová, Marie Jelínková, Elena Tulupova, Michal Koščík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jolana Kopsa TěšinováInstitute of Public Health and Medical Law, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-9763
Karolína DobiášováInstitute of Public Health and Medical Law, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9384-1076
Marie JelínkováInstitute of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-0447
Elena TulupovaInstitute of Public Health and Medical Law, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-7714
Michal KoščíkDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9243-6391

Funding

This study was supported by the NPO 'Systemic Risk Institute' number LX22NPO5101, funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, NPO: EXCELES). This study was also supported by the European Regional Development Fund project 'Beyond Security: Role of Conflict in Resilience-Building' (Reg. No.: CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004595) and SYRI.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA growing body of research is examining how healthcare systems are responding to the increasing numbers of migrants and the resulting superdiversity of patients. The aim of this article is to identify and explain communication barriers in the provision of healthcare to Ukrainian war refugees in the Czech Republic from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and intercultural mediators.

methodsThe exploratory case study is based on a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with frontline health professionals: 20 with doctors and 10 with nurses. The second source of data is two focus groups aimed at capturing communication problems from the perspective of intercultural mediators who accompany refugees to health facilities. The interview transcripts and FGs were analysed using six-stage thematic coding.

resultsThe survey identified five main themes related to barriers to communication: (1) language barriers and interpreting, (2) cultural barriers, (3) differing expectations of health and the healthcare systems in the Czech Republic and Ukraine, (4) prejudices and negative attitudes and unethical behaviour towards refugees and migrants and (5) lack of awareness of patient rights.

conclusionsThe arrival of large numbers of migrants has highlighted deficiencies in the system that may affect other vulnerable groups and the general population. These include the lack of general communication skills and legal awareness among many health professionals, which are barriers to the development of patient-centred care. The involvement of intercultural mediators fundamentally improves communication between health professionals and (not only) migrant patients. Nevertheless, it is necessary to legally anchor and define the position of intercultural mediators within the healthcare system. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Collaboration with intercultural mediators who interpreted the extensive experiences of Ukrainian refugee patients and also have personal experience as migrant or migrant-origin patients contributed to shaping research questions, facilitating study participation and enriching evidence interpretation. Researchers with multicultural backgrounds and experience with working with people from refugee backgrounds were involved in the study design and analysis.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersRefugeesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationCzech RepublicDelivery of Health CareFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUkrainecommunication barriersforced migrationhealth careintercultural mediatorsUkrainians

Identifiers

PMID39150347
PMCPMC11328340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.