ReviewThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2024
Non-biopsy Strategy for the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults: A Narrative Review.
Review in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the systemic immune-inflammation index in relation to histological stages of celiac disease.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Can the Mucosa Heal Histologically in Celiac Disease? What are the Indicators of Remission in Celiac Patients?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Applicability of ESPGHAN Biopsy-Free Guidelines for Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Insights from Türkiye.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CeD) diagnosis is a complicated process, requiring a multi-step procedure and a high level of clinical knowledge. Some scientific societies, mainly from Europe and North America, have proposed appropriate guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CeD. Since duodenal biopsy is particularly challenging for children, guidelines of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, presented in 2012 and updated in 2020, have made it possible to avoid the biopsy in symptomatic pediatric patients with high levels of IgA anti-transglutaminase. Several parallel, similar studies in adults support the non-biopsy strategy. However, several pros and cons exist in applying such a strategy. The present narrative review reports the current evidence and the implication of omitting biopsy in the diagnosis of CeD in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.