ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024
Evaluation of a point-of-care rapid HIV antibody test with insights into acute HIV symptomatology in a population with low prevalence.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dual-Port, Smartphone-Linked, Pocket-Size Fluorimeter for Rapid Molecular Diagnostic Assays at Point of Care.IEEE sensors journal · 2026Article
- Public health implications of diagnosing and treating acute HIV.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
- Rapid diagnosis of acute HIV-1 infection cases: first real-world performance of point-of-care HIV-1 nucleic acid testing in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many emergency departments (ED) use rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody tests as screening tools, despite limited sensitivity for detecting acute HIV infections. In a 4-year retrospective analysis of 1,192 patients, we evaluated the performance of a third-generation rapid HIV antibody assay tested at point-of-care (POC, Chembio Sure Check HIV 1/2) against in-lab fourth-generation screening (Abbott Architect Ag/Ab Combo). Compared to complete algorithmic testing, the POC test demonstrated a 92.5% sensitivity (95% CI = 84.6-96.5), 98.1% specificity (95% CI = 97.1-98.8), 99.5% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI = 98.8-99.8), and a 77.9% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI = 68.6-85.1). Notably, the POC test failed to detect 100% (3/3) of acute HIV infections (defined as Fiebig stage 2) and 3.8% (2/52) established HIV infections, where viral loads were 5.9, 6.7, and >7 log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.