ArticlePediatric pulmonology2024
Combining artificial intelligence and conventional statistics to predict bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants using routinely collected clinical variables.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Opportunities and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and Imaging Data-based Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-analysis.Current medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Early prediction of moderate-to-severe BPD or death in preterm infants using minute-level respiratory monitoring and explainable machine learning.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Lung Function Trajectories After Preterm Birth: A Life-Course Approach to Age-Specific Monitoring.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI models in clinical neonatology: a review of modeling approaches and a consensus proposal for standardized reporting of model performance.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Advancements in biomarkers and machine learning for predicting of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Combining artificial intelligence and conventional statistics to predict bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants using routinely collected clinical variables.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrematurity is the strongest predictor of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Most previous studies investigated additional risk factors by conventional statistics, while the few studies applying artificial intelligence, and specifically machine learning (ML), for this purpose were mainly targeted to the predictive ability of specific interventions. This study aimed to apply ML to identify, among routinely collected data, variables predictive of BPD, and to compare these variables with those identified through conventional statistics.
methodsVery preterm infants were recruited; antenatal, perinatal, and postnatal clinical data were collected. A BPD prediction model was built using conventional statistics, and nine supervised ML algorithms were applied for the same purpose: the results of the best-performing model were described and compared with those of conventional statistics.
resultsBoth conventional statistics and ML identified the degree of immaturity (low gestational age and/or birth weight), need for mechanical ventilation, and absent or reversed end diastolic flow (AREDF) in the umbilical arteries as risk factors for BPD. Each of the two approaches also identified additional potentially predictive clinical variables.
conclusionML algorithms might be useful to integrate conventional statistics in identifying novel risk factors, in addition to prematurity, for the development of BPD in very preterm infants. Specifically, the identification of AREDF status as an independent risk factor for BPD by both conventional statistics and ML highlights the opportunity to include detailed antenatal information in clinical predictive models for neonatal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.