Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150090›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2024

Research Review: Why do prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment differ? A narrative review.

Oonagh Coleman, Jessie R Baldwin, Tim Dalgleish, Kelly Rose-Clarke, Cathy Spatz Widom, Andrea Danese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Autistic traits in childhood and post-traumatic stress disorder as young adults: a cohort study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oonagh ColemanSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-2590-1995
Jessie R BaldwinSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5703-5058
Tim DalgleishMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-2231
Kelly Rose-ClarkeInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8959-9184
Cathy Spatz WidomPsychology Department, John Jay College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-4905
Andrea DaneseSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8718-5412

Funding

THIRTY YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF NEGLECTED CHILDRENR01HD040774 · NICHD · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WIDOM, CATHY SPATZ · 2000 to 2009
$8.7M
Child Maltreatment and Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG058683 · NIA · JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE · PI WIDOM, CATHY SPATZ · 2018 to 2022
$7.6M
CHILDHOOD VICTIMIZATION AND LIFETIME REVICTIMIZATIONR01MH058386 · NIMH · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WIDOM, CATHY SPATZ · 1999 to 2003
$2.8M
LONGTERM MENTAL OUTCOMES OF CHILD ABUSE &NEGLECTR01MH049467 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI WIDOM, CATHY SPATZ · 1992 to 1994
–
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD40774Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/5Mental Health Research UKNational Institute of Justice 86-IJ-CX-00333NIA NIH HHS AG058683NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058683NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD040774NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre BRC-1215-20014NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203318NIMH NIH HHS MH49467NIMH NIH HHS MH58386NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH049467NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058386UK Research and Innovation MR/W00285X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215917/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood maltreatment contributes to a large mental health burden worldwide. Different measures of childhood maltreatment are not equivalent and may capture meaningful differences. In particular, prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment identify different groups of individuals and are differentially associated with psychopathology. However, the reasons behind these discrepancies have not yet been comprehensively mapped.

methodsIn this review, we draw on multi-disciplinary research and present an integrated framework to explain maltreatment measurement disagreement.

resultsWe identified three interrelated domains. First, methodological issues related to measurement and data collection methods. Second, the role of memory in influencing retrospective reports of maltreatment. Finally, the motivations individuals may have to disclose, withhold, or fabricate information about maltreatment.

conclusionsA greater understanding of maltreatment measurement disagreement may point to new ways to conceptualise and assess maltreatment. Furthermore, it may help uncover mechanisms underlying maltreatment-related psychopathology and targets for novel interventions.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChildHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective Studieschild abuseChildhood maltreatmentchildhood traumamemoryneglectpsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID39150090
PMCPMC11834142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.