ArticleEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2025
Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cytology: 10 years' experience of a colposcopic referral center.
Article in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative HPV Viral Load Measured by ΔCt for Risk Stratification in Cervical Cancer Screening.Cancers · 2026Article
- Pap testing and high-risk HPV testing for women aged 65 years and older with surgical pathology follow-up.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
- Assessment of the efficiency and accuracy of an artificial intelligence assistive system in the diagnosis of Pap cervical atypical glandular cell cytology.Cancer cytopathology · 2025Article
- Risk Assessment of Precancers and Cancers in Women with Atypical Glandular Cells of Endocervical, Endometrial, and Unknown Origin.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction'Atypical glandular cells' (AGC) is an uncommon cytological result of cervical Pap smears which includes a wide of histopathological diagnoses, from benign to premalignant and malignant cervical disorders, endometrial cancer and, occasionally, other genital malignancies. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of AGC, assessing risk factors and clinical and histological features in affected patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 239 women diagnosed with AGC between 2012 and 2022 at the 'Regional Referral Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of HPV-related Genital Disorders', Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. Following AGC detection, patients underwent colposcopy with endocervical sampling and endometrial assessment via pelvic ultrasound. Selective cases also received endometrial biopsies.
resultsAmong a total of 190 women who underwent both colposcopy and endometrial assessment, 116 (61%) had negative clinical and histopathological findings. The remainder displayed various abnormalities: 36 women (18.9%) were found to have endometrial or cervical polyps, 23 (12.1%) were diagnosed with preinvasive cervical neoplasia, and 21 (10.9%) with invasive cervical or endometrial disease. Menopause, multiparity, and older age were all significantly associated with endometrial cancer, but none of the abovementioned variables were significantly associated with cervical neoplasia.
conclusionOur data confirm that AGC may reveal the presence of a wide range of histopathological conditions. Patients diagnosed with AGC should undergo a careful evaluation including both colposcopy with endocervical sampling and an endometrial assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.