Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149970›Full record

Observational studyAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024

Regional variation in diagnostic intensity of dementia among older U.S. adults: An observational study.

Julie P W Bynum, Slim Benloucif, Jonathan Martindale, A James O'Malley, Matthew A Davis

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primary care preparedness to care for patients with ADRD: A national survey study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Regional variation in diagnostic intensity of dementia among older US adults: An observational study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Regional variation in diagnostic intensity of dementia among older U.S. adults: An observational study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie P W BynumDepartment of Internal Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Dr Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Slim BenloucifDepartment of Internal Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Dr Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jonathan MartindaleDepartment of Internal Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Dr Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
A James O'MalleyGeisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 1 Medical Center Dr Lebanon, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Matthew A DavisInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Leila S. Agha · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeographic variation in diagnosed cases of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) could be due to underlying population risk or differences in intensity of new case identification. Areas with low ADRD diagnostic intensity could be targeted for additional surveillance efforts.

methodsMedicare claims were used for a cohort of older adults across hospital referral regions (HRRs). ADRD-specific regional diagnosis intensity was measured as the ratio of expected new ADRD cases (estimated using population demographics, risk factors, and practice intensity) compared to observed ADRD-diagnosed cases.

resultsCrude new ADRD diagnosis rate ranged from 1.7 to 5.4 per 100 across HRRs. ADRD-specific diagnosis intensity ranged from 0.69 to 1.47 and varied most for Black, Hispanic, and the youngest (66-74) subgroups. Across all subgroups, ADRD diagnosis intensity was associated with 2-fold difference in receiving an ADRD diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Where one resides influences the likelihood of receiving an ADRD diagnosis, particularly among those 66-74 years of age and minoritized groups. HIGHLIGHTS: Rate of new Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) case identification varies geographically across the United States. Variation in case identification is greatest in Black, Hispanic, and young-old groups. Intensity of diagnosis (ie, case identification) unrelated to population risk differs across place. Likelihood of receiving an ADRD diagnosis varies 2-fold based on place of residence.

Indexed as

DementiaMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBlack or African AmericanCohort StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleRisk FactorsUnited StatesAlzheimer's diseasedementiadiagnosisMedicareregional variation

Identifiers

PMID39149970
PMCPMC11485555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.