ReviewNucleic acids research2024
A new perspective on microRNA-guided gene regulation specificity, and its potential generalization to transcription factors and RNA-binding proteins.
Review in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repression of miR-29 via MYC leads to increased CD40 signaling in transformed follicular lymphoma.Leukemia · 2026Trial
- Circulating microRNAs reveal egg-brain crosstalk and a brain-predominant microRNA linked to the onset of the next reproductive cycle in iteroparous salmonids.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Programming anti-ribozymes to sense trigger RNAs for modulating gene expression in mammalian cells.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Article
- Nuclear Argonaute:miRNA complexes recognize target sequences within chromatin-associated RNA and silence gene expression.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- It is Time to Revisit miRNA Therapeutics.Nucleic acid therapeutics · 2025Review
- Integrated Analysis of microRNA Targets Reveals New Insights into Transcriptional-Post-Transcriptional Regulatory Cross-Talk.Biology · 2025Article
- Protein swarm-based cause-effect analysis: effects of microRNAs on cooperation networks linking COVID-19 infections, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Our conception of gene regulation specificity has undergone profound changes over the last 20 years. Previously, regulators were considered to control few genes, recognized with exquisite specificity by a 'lock and key' mechanism. However, recently genome-wide exploration of regulator binding site occupancy (whether on DNA or RNA targets) revealed extensive lists of molecular targets for every studied regulator. Such poor biochemical specificity suggested that each regulator controls many genes, collectively contributing to biological phenotypes. Here, I propose a third model, whereby regulators' biological specificity is only partially due to 'lock and key' biochemistry. Rather, regulators affect many genes at the microscopic scale, but biological consequences for most interactions are attenuated at the mesoscopic scale: only a few regulatory events propagate from microscopic to macroscopic scale; others are made inconsequential by homeostatic mechanisms. This model is well supported by the microRNA literature, and data suggest that it extends to other regulators. It reconciles contradicting observations from biochemistry and comparative genomics on one hand and in vivo genetics on the other hand, but this conceptual unification is obscured by common misconceptions and counter-intuitive modes of graphical display. Profound understanding of gene regulation requires conceptual clarification, and better suited statistical analyses and graphical representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.