ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Improved sub-genomic RNA prediction with the ARTIC protocol.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How benchmarking of bioinformatics tools is essential for informed workflow selection: a case study on SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA detection.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Viral subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) plays a major role in SARS-COV2's replication, pathogenicity, and evolution. Recent sequencing protocols, such as the ARTIC protocol, have been established. However, due to the viral-specific biological processes, analyzing sgRNA through viral-specific read sequencing data is a computational challenge. Current methods rely on computational tools designed for eukaryote genomes, resulting in a gap in the tools designed specifically for sgRNA detection. To address this, we make two contributions. Firstly, we present sgENERATE, an evaluation pipeline to study the accuracy and efficacy of sgRNA detection tools using the popular ARTIC sequencing protocol. Using sgENERATE, we evaluate periscope, a recently introduced tool that detects sgRNA from ARTIC sequencing data. We find that periscope has biased predictions and high computational costs. Secondly, using the information produced from sgENERATE, we redesign the algorithm in periscope to use multiple references from canonical sgRNAs to mitigate alignment issues and improve sgRNA and non-canonical sgRNA detection. We evaluate periscope and our algorithm, periscope_multi, on simulated and biological sequencing datasets and demonstrate periscope_multi's enhanced sgRNA detection accuracy. Our contribution advances tools for studying viral sgRNA, paving the way for more accurate and efficient analyses in the context of viral RNA discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.