Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149824›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2024

A survey of the representativeness and usefulness of wastewater-based surveillance systems in 10 countries across Europe in 2023.

Guido Benedetti, Lene Wulff Krogsgaard, Sabine Maritschnik, Hans Peter Stüger, Veronik Hutse, Raphael Janssens, Soile Blomqvist, Tarja Pitkänen, Anastasia Koutsolioutsou, Eszter Róka and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating AMR surveillance into wastewater monitoring systems in 2025: a position on the implementation of Article 17 of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD).Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Guido BenedettiDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene Wulff KrogsgaardDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sabine MaritschnikAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Surveillance and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Vienna, Austria.
Hans Peter StügerAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Department of Statistics and Analytical Epidemiology, Vienna, Austria.
Veronik HutseCOVID-19 Wastewater Surveillance, Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Raphael JanssensCOVID-19 Wastewater Surveillance, Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Soile BlomqvistExpert Microbiology Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Tarja PitkänenDepartment of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anastasia KoutsolioutsouDepartment of Environmental Health and Monitoring of Smoking Cessation, Directorate of Epidemiology and Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries, National Public Health Organisation, Marousi, Greece.
Eszter RókaNational Center for Public Health and Pharmacy, Budapest, Hungary.
Marta VarghaNational Center for Public Health and Pharmacy, Budapest, Hungary.
Giuseppina La RosaNational Center for Water Safety (CeNSia), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta SuffrediniDepartment of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Henry-Michel CauchieLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Environmental Research and Innovation Department (ERIN), Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Leslie OgorzalyLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Environmental Research and Innovation Department (ERIN), Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Rudolf Fhj van der BeekCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Willemijn J LodderCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Elisabeth Henie MadslienDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Jose Antonio Baz LombaDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Steen EthelbergDepartment of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has become a widespread method to monitor transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other human pathogens in Europe. We conducted a survey about WBS systems' objectives, approaches, representativeness and usefulness in 10 invited European countries in 2023, i.e. Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Norway. All countries completed the study questionnaire about their SARS-CoV-2 WBS systems, and shared information about WBS of other pathogens as deemed relevant. SARS-CoV-2 WBS systems primarily monitored national and subnational trends (population coverage: 25-99%), and a majority (8/10) also tracked variant distribution. Nine of 10 countries reported that their SARS-CoV-2 WBS systems were representative of their population and all countries remarked that the findings were valuable for public health decision-making. Results were shared with relevant public health authorities and published via dedicated websites and/or dashboards. WBS systems of other pathogens were mostly in the early stages, with some countries implementing pilots. Notable exceptions were the well-established poliovirus surveillance systems in Finland, Italy and the Netherlands. This study brings understanding the diverse landscape of WBS in Europe, offering insights for future developments and collaborations. Furthermore, it highlights the need for further integration of WBS into other European surveillance systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2WastewaterEuropeHumansPandemicsPopulation SurveillancePublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringWastewaterEuropeinfectious diseasePublic Health SurveillanceRepresentativenessSARS-CoV-2UsefulnessWastewater-based epidemiological monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39149824
PMCPMC11328501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.