Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149753›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024

CT-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma: Dosimetric and initial clinical experience.

Albert Lee, Jared Pasetsky, Elizaveta Lavrova, Yi-Fang Wang, Geoffrey Sedor, Feng L Li, Matthew Gallitto, Matthew Garrett, Carl Elliston, Michael Price and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Experience and uncertainty analysis of CT-based adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal treatments.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Albert LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jared PasetskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Elizaveta LavrovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Yi-Fang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Geoffrey SedorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Feng L LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Matthew GallittoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Matthew GarrettDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Carl EllistonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Michael PriceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Lisa A KachnicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
David P HorowitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

CAPRI: Columbia Cancer Research Training Program for Resident-InvestigatorsR38CA277850 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Katherine D Crew, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R38 CA277850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: Retrospective analysis suggests that dose escalation to a biologically effective dose of more than 70 Gy may improve overall survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but such treatments in practice are limited by proximity of organs at risk (OARs). We hypothesized that CT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) can account for interfraction movement of OARs and allow for safe delivery of ablative doses. Materials/Methods: This is a single institution retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC treated with OART on the Ethos platform (Varian Medical Systems, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto). All patients were treated to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. PTV overlapping with a 5 mm planning risk volume expansion on the stomach, duodenum and bowel received 25 Gy. Initial treatment plans were created conventionally. For each fraction, PTV and OAR volumes were recontoured with AI assistance after initial cone beam CT (CBCT). The adapted plan was calculated, underwent QA, and then compared to the scheduled plan. A second CBCT was obtained prior to delivery of the selected plan. Total treatment time (first CBCT to end of radiation delivery) and active physician time (first to second CBCT) were recorded. PTV_4000 V95 %, PTV_2500 V9 5%, and D0.03 cc to stomach, duodenum and bowel were reported for scheduled (S) and adapted (A) plans. CTCAEv5.0 toxicities were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sided T test and α of 0.05. Results: 21 patients with unresectable or locally-recurrent PDAC were analyzed, with a total of 105 fractions. Average total time was 29 min and 16 s (16:36-49:40) and average active physician time was 19:41 min (9:25-39:34). All fractions were treated with adapted plans. 97 % of adapted plans met PTV_4000 V95.0 % >95.0 % coverage goal and 100 % of adapted plans met OAR dose constraints. Median follow up was 6.6 months. Only 1 patient experienced acute grade 3+ toxicity directly attributable to radiation. Only 1 patient experienced late grade 3+ toxicity directly attributable to radiation. Conclusions: Daily CT-based OART was associated with significantly reduced dose OARs while achieving superior PTV coverage. Given the relatively quick total treatment time, radiation delivery was generally well tolerated and easily incorporated into the clinic workflow. Our initial clinical experience demonstrates OART allows for safe dose escalation in the treatment of PDAC.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiationOARTPancreatic cancerPDACRadiotherapySBRT

Identifiers

PMID39149753
PMCPMC11324999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.