Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149747›Full record

ReviewSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant intrathecal dexamethasone during spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thrivikrama P Tantry, Vasantha Shetty, Aarti Deepak, Sumesh Murali, Murali S B Golitadka, Shreejith K Menon, Sunil P Shenoy, Dinesh Kadam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Narrative Review on Multimodal Spinal Anesthesia: Old Technique and New Use.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thrivikrama P TantryDepartment of Anaesthesiology, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vasantha ShettyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Aarti DeepakDepartment of Anaesthesiology, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sumesh MuraliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Donnelly South, Canada.
Murali S B GolitadkaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Burjeel Medical City, Mohammedbin Zayed City, Abudhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Shreejith K MenonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sunil P ShenoyDepartment of Urology, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Dinesh KadamDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of intrathecal (IT) dexamethasone during subarachnoid block (SAB) has not been evaluated. There are no pooled data available to decide on the optimal regimen of IT dexamethasone during SAB, irrespective of the type of surgery. There is uncertainty about its dosage, effectiveness, and safety, and a need to establish clear guidelines on its use. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of use of IT dexamethasone during SAB. We performed a meta-analysis (PROSPERO, CRD42022304944) of trials that included patients who underwent a variety of surgical procedures under SAB. Patients received concomitant IT dexamethasone as an adjuvant to spinal local anesthetics. The analyzed outcomes included sensory and motor effects as well as adverse and/or beneficial side effects. Subgroup analysis was planned based on different doses used. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to estimate the required sample size information (RIS) for each outcome. Eighteen studies (2531 participants) were included in this analysis. Addition of IT dexamethasone (4-8 mg) to heavy bupivacaine effectively prolonged the duration of sensory blockade (mean difference, MD = 63.8 minutes; [95% confidence interval, CI, 33.1-94.5], P < 0.0001), two-segment regression time (MD = 20.1[95% CI, 0.96-39.2], P = 0.04) and first rescue analgesic time (MD = 143.3 [95% CI, 90.3-196.0], P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed superior effects of 8 mg dose over 4 mg for sensory and analgesic effects. The effect of dexamethasone on duration of motor blockade was inconclusive. Additionally, lower risk ratios (RRs) were recorded for spinal anesthesia-related hypotension (RR = 0.74 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9], P = 0.0003) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.93], P = 0.02) in the dexamethasone group. For outcomes such as sensory blockade, analgesia, and hypotension, the required information size was reached during TSA. In conclusion, IT dexamethasone, used as an adjuvant to spinal local anesthetic, especially at the dose of 8 mg, increases sensory blockade duration and the time for request of the first rescue analgesic. SAB-induced side effects such as hypotension, nausea, and vomiting are lesser with the use of IT dexamethasone. However, further studies are necessary to draw meaningful conclusions on its safety profile.

Indexed as

Adjuvantsanalgesiaanesthesiadexamethasonemeta-analysisspinal

Identifiers

PMID39149747
PMCPMC11323928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.