Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149692›Full record

ArticleACI open2019

Oncologists' Perceptions of a Digital Tool to Improve Cancer Survivors' Cardiovascular Health.

Marjorie Kelley, Randi Foraker, En-Ju Deborah Lin, Manjusha Kulkarni, Maryam Lustberg, Kathryn E Weaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACI open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrating Diet Screening Into Routine Clinical Care: The Time Is Now.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marjorie KelleyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Randi ForakerDivision of General Medicine, Washington University St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
En-Ju Deborah LinNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Manjusha KulkarniOhio State University Wexner Medical Center-Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Maryam LustbergDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Kathryn E WeaverWake Forest School of Medicine-Social Sciences and Health Policy, Office of Women in Medicine and Science, Winstom-Salem, North Carolina, United States.

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Extending Automated Heart Health Assessment (AH-HA) for Cancer Survivors to Expand Provider and Patient Reach and Promote SustainabilityR01CA226078 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RANDI E FORAKER, Kathryn Elizabeth Weaver · 2018 to 2026
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) disease continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with higher rates among cancer survivors than in the general population. Objective: This study was aimed to understand oncology providers' attitudes toward a digital CV health tool, delivered via a tablet, to promote CV health in cancer survivors. Methods: Using qualitative methods, 14 oncologists, from community and academic practice sites, were interviewed while they used the tool. Interviews were videotaped then analyzed using NVivo 11 software. Themes were inductively developed from the interviews. Results: Three major themes emerged from the interviews as follows: (1) system functionality, (2) facilitators and barriers to integration, and (3) appropriate end-users. Oncologists recognized the critical role of CV health promotion among cancer survivors and identified features about the tool that would be helpful for CV health promotion. Workflow (subtheme) was a barrier to tool use. This feedback enabled tool redesign for further testing in the context of survivorship care. Conclusion: Our findings emphasized the importance of identifying appropriate End-users which may include other survivorship care providers, patients, and primary care providers. Implications: Our research addresses the knowledge gap in the use of digital tools in cancer survivorship care, specifically digital tools to promote CV health. Future research is needed to evaluate digital tools in cancer survivorship care. Research investigating patients as users of digital tools may provide additional insight.

Indexed as

cancer survivorscardiovascular diseaselifestylemedical informaticspatient participation

Identifiers

PMID39149692
PMCPMC11326518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.