ArticleCureus2024
Predicting the Need for Advanced Respiratory Support in COVID-19 Patients During the Initial Pandemic Phase: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Full-Blood Inflammatory Ratios Predict Length of Stay but Not Early Death in Romanian Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), led to high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. It is known that some patients, initially hospitalized in general wards, deteriorate over time and require advanced respiratory support (ARS). This study aimed to identify key risk factors predicting the need for ARS in patients during the pandemic's early months. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, we included patients admitted within the first three months of the pandemic who were diagnosed with COVID-19 via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The patients who required ARS or invasive mechanical ventilation at admission were excluded. Data on demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were collected. Statistical analyses, including multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, were performed to identify independent predictors of ARS and determine the cut-off point.
resultsAmong 162 patients, 32.1% required ARS. Key differences between ARS and non-ARS groups included age, body mass index (BMI), coronary artery disease prevalence, neutrophil count, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, D-dimer, troponin T levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation response index (SIRI), and symptom-to-admission time. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, elevated CRP levels, elevated ferritin levels, and SIRI were significant predictors for ARS. The ROC curve for SIRI showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.785, with a cut-off value of 1.915.
conclusionsAge, CRP levels, ferritin levels, and SIRI are crucial predictors of the need for ARS in COVID-19 patients. The early identification of high-risk patients is essential for timely interventions and resource optimization, particularly during the early stages of pandemics. These insights may assist in optimizing strategies for future respiratory health crisis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.