ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
SING IMT in pseudophakic eyes: Results of the first experiences.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of the Smaller-Incision New Generation Implantable Miniature Telescope for Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Surgical repositioning of a SING IMT following haptic dislocation: Restoration of alignment and visual function.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Add-on implantation of the smaller-incision new generation implantable miniature telescope (SING IMT™) in pseudophakic eyes.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of implanting the Smaller-Incision New-Generation Implantable Miniature Telescope (SING IMT) in pseudophakic patients affected by late-stage dry AMD. Subjects: Five pseudophakic patients' eyes with stable dry AMD were suitable for SING IMT implantation. Four eyes were excluded because of previous YAG laser capsulotomy. Patients underwent preoperative assessments, including visual acuity measurements and OCT scans. Methods: Surgical procedures were performed under peribulbar anesthesia, with careful IOL removal and SING IMT implantation. Postoperative follow-up was conducted at regular intervals to monitor visual acuity, device positioning and complications. Results: Postoperative outcomes demonstrated improvements in visual acuity for most patients with an average gain in CDVA (Corrected Distance Visual Acuity) and CNVA (Corrected Near Visual Acuity) of 16,8 ± 10,2 and 13,8 ± 7,4 ETDRS letters, respectively. Limited complications have been observed. In one case, we observed dislocation of the device into the vitreous chamber, which we managed through vitrectomy and scleral fixation of the SING IMT using GoreTex suture. Conclusions: Despite being traditionally contraindicated for pseudophakic patients, SING IMT implantation in selected cases yielded favorable outcomes, indicating potential benefits for this population. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to refine patient selection criteria and optimize surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.