Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149581›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Preclinical evaluation of reversible pulsed electrical field: electrophysiological and histological assessment of myocardium.

Zongwang Zhai, Yuchen Ling, Yanjiang Wang, Liang Shi, Xingpeng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zongwang ZhaiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuchen LingDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai HT Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yanjiang WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liang ShiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xingpeng LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation, as a non-thermal ablation modality, has received increasing attention. The aim of this study is to explore whether a reversible pulsed electric field (RPEF) can temporarily inhibit electrical conduction and provide a novel method for precise ablation of arrhythmia. Methods: RPEF energy was delivered from an ablation catheter to the atrium of six dogs, followed by a series of electrogram and histology assessments. Results: RPEF ablation of ordinary myocardium resulted in an average reduction of 68.3% (range, 53.7%-83.8%) in electrogram amplitude, while 5 min later, the amplitude in eight electrograms returned to 77.9% (range, 72.4%-87.3%) of baseline. Similarly, the amplitude of the sinoatrial node electrograms reduced by an average of 73.0% (range, 60.2%-84.4%) after RPEF ablation, but recovered to 84.9% (range, 80.3%-88.5%) of baseline by 5 min. No necrotic change was detected in histopathology. Transient third-degree atrioventricular block occurred following the ablation of the maximum His potential sites with RPEF, the duration of which was voltage dependent. The histopathological results showed necrosis of the myocardium at the ablation sites but no injury to His bundle cells. Conclusions: RPEF can be applied to transiently block electrical conduction in myocardial tissues contributing to precise ablation.

Indexed as

critical isthmus siteselectroporationpara-Hisian arrhythmiaprecise ablationreversible pulsed electric fieldssinus node modification

Identifiers

PMID39149581
PMCPMC11325456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.