Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149338›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for delayed outcomes during contingent learning.

Phillip P Witkowski, Lindsay Rondot, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Mona M Garvert, Raymond J Dolan, Timothy E J Behrens, Erie D Boorman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phillip P WitkowskiCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95618.ORCID 0000-0001-7377-1592
Lindsay RondotCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95618.
Zeb Kurth-NelsonMax Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.
Mona M GarvertFaculty of Human Sciences, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Raymond J DolanMax Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-761X
Timothy E J BehrensWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0048-1177
Erie D BoormanCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95618.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-4499

Funding

Neurocomputational mechanisms of learning and decision-making and their disruption in addiction ZIADA000642 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI KAHNT, THORSTEN · 2022 to 2025
$7.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000642Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive behavior in complex environments critically relies on the ability to appropriately link specific choices or actions to their outcomes. However, the neural mechanisms that support the ability to credit only those past choices believed to have caused the observed outcomes remain unclear. Here, we leverage multivariate pattern analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and an adaptive learning task to shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of such specific credit assignment. We find that the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and hippocampus (HC) code for the causal choice identity when credit needs to be assigned for choices that are separated from outcomes by a long delay, even when this delayed transition is punctuated by interim decisions. Further, we show when interim decisions must be made, learning is additionally supported by lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC). Our results indicate that lFPC holds previous causal choices in a "pending" state until a relevant outcome is observed, and the fidelity of these representations predicts the fidelity of subsequent causal choice representations in lOFC and HC during credit assignment. Together, these results highlight the importance of the timely reinstatement of specific causes in lOFC and HC in learning choice-outcome relationships when delays and choices intervene, a critical component of real-world learning and decision making.

Identifiers

PMID39149338
PMCPMC11326259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.