ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
In-silico heart model phantom to validate cardiac strain imaging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quantification of cardiac strains as structural indices of cardiac function has a growing prevalence in clinical diagnosis. However, the highly heterogeneous four-dimensional (4D) cardiac motion challenges accurate "regional" strain quantification and leads to sizable differences in the estimated strains depending on the imaging modality and post-processing algorithm, limiting the translational potential of strains as incremental biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction. There remains a crucial need for a feasible benchmark that successfully replicates complex 4D cardiac kinematics to determine the reliability of strain calculation algorithms. In this study, we propose an in-silico heart phantom derived from finite element (FE) simulations to validate the quantification of 4D regional strains. First, as a proof-of-concept exercise, we created synthetic magnetic resonance (MR) images for a hollow thick-walled cylinder under pure torsion with an exact solution and demonstrated that "ground-truth" values can be recovered for the twist angle, which is also a key kinematic index in the heart. Next, we used mouse-specific FE simulations of cardiac kinematics to synthesize dynamic MR images by sampling various sectional planes of the left ventricle (LV). Strains were calculated using our recently developed non-rigid image registration (NRIR) framework in both problems. Moreover, we studied the effects of image quality on distorting regional strain calculations by conducting in-silico experiments for various LV configurations. Our studies offer a rigorous and feasible tool to standardize regional strain calculations to improve their clinical impact as incremental biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.