ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Peptide-aware chemical language model successfully predicts membrane diffusion of cyclic peptides.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language modeling applied to biological data has significantly advanced the prediction of membrane penetration for small molecule drugs and natural peptides. However, accurately predicting membrane diffusion for peptides with pharmacologically relevant modifications remains a substantial challenge. Here, we introduce PeptideCLM, a peptide-focused chemical language model capable of encoding peptides with chemical modifications, unnatural or non-canonical amino acids, and cyclizations. We assess this model by predicting membrane diffusion of cyclic peptides, demonstrating greater predictive power than existing chemical language models. Our model is versatile and can be extended beyond membrane diffusion predictions to other target values. Its advantages include the ability to model macromolecules using chemical string notation, a largely unexplored domain, and a simple, flexible architecture that allows for adaptation to any peptide or other macromolecule dataset.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.