ArticleJPGN reports2024
Considerable differences in management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with biliary atresia.
Article in JPGN reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Patients with biliary atresia (BA) and ongoing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection may have poorer outcomes after Kasai portoenterostomy than uninfected patients. Still, there is no consensus on the usefulness of viral testing and antiviral treatment (AVT). This study aims to explore the need for future research on AVT for CMV infection by assessing how CMV infection in BA patients is managed in different centers. Methods: An online questionnaire with 10 questions was offered to participants at an international congress on BA, organized in collaboration with the European Reference Network for rare liver diseases in 2022. Answers to questions were either dichotomic or multiple choices of different numeric intervals. Ongoing CMV infection was defined by detecting cytomegalovirus-immunoglobulin M (CMV-IgM) in serum or cytomegalovirus-deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV-DNA) by polymerase chain reaction in blood or urine. Results: There were 43 respondents from 36 centers in 26 countries. The total number of BA patients per year was between 208 and 380 from centers with 0-5 to >20 BA patients yearly (median 6-10). CMV infection was tested in 27 centers (75%), of which 18 (67%) use AVT. The rate of CMV infection varied between 0%-5% and 40%-50% (median 5%-10%). Willingness to treat the infection did not differ between centers with low and high rates of CMV infection. Conclusions: Most centers test for CMV infection, and a considerable proportion use AVT despite the lack of evidence of its benefits. A future randomized study on treating CMV infection in BA patients is necessary and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.