Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149156›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Predicting neuroticism with open-ended response using natural language processing.

Seowon Yoon, Jihee Jang, Gaeun Son, Soohyun Park, Jueun Hwang, Joon Yeon Choeh, Kee-Hong Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seowon YoonSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihee JangSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gaeun SonSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soohyun ParkSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jueun HwangSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Yeon ChoehDepartment of Software, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kee-Hong ChoiSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With rapid advancements in natural language processing (NLP), predicting personality using this technology has become a significant research interest. In personality prediction, exploring appropriate questions that elicit natural language is particularly important because questions determine the context of responses. This study aimed to predict levels of neuroticism-a core psychological trait known to predict various psychological outcomes-using responses to a series of open-ended questions developed based on the five-factor model of personality. This study examined the model's accuracy and explored the influence of item content in predicting neuroticism. Methods: A total of 425 Korean adults were recruited and responded to 18 open-ended questions about their personalities, along with the measurement of the Five-Factor Model traits. In total, 30,576 Korean sentences were collected. To develop the prediction models, the pre-trained language model KoBERT was used. Accuracy, F1 Score, Precision, and Recall were calculated as evaluation metrics. Results: The results showed that items inquiring about social comparison, unintended harm, and negative feelings performed better in predicting neuroticism than other items. For predicting depressivity, items related to negative feelings, social comparison, and emotions showed superior performance. For dependency, items related to unintended harm, social dominance, and negative feelings were the most predictive. Discussion: We identified items that performed better at neuroticism prediction than others. Prediction models developed based on open-ended questions that theoretically aligned with neuroticism exhibited superior predictive performance.

Indexed as

computational personality assessmentlanguage analysisnatural language processingneuroticismopen-ended questionspersonality prediction

Identifiers

PMID39149156
PMCPMC11324482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.