ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024
Secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer- experience from a tertiary care centre in India.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The evolving role of open abdominal surgery in gynecological malignancies in the era of minimally invasive and precision oncology.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ovarian cancer is a disease that presents in advanced stage, due to the absence of any specific or overtly dramatic symptoms. The standard of care is primary debulking surgery, followed by chemotherapy. Ovarian cancer recurrence treatment is very challenging and there is always a debate between cytoreduction vs chemotherapy. Methods: The electronic medical records of all patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer between January 2011 and December 2019 were retrieved the patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery in our department during this time period were included. Results: A total of 52 patients underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer during the study period. Median treatment free interval after primary treatment was 20 months (range 6-132). The secondary cytoreductive surgery was highly complex in 4(8 %) patients,19 (37 %) had intermediate surgical complexity score, 29 (55 %) had low surgical complexity score according to the Aletti complexity score. Secondary cytoreductive surgery was complete (no macroscopic residual disease) in 31(60 %); Optimal (R1) in 17 (33 %) and suboptimal in only 4 (7 %) of the patients. Out of the 52 patients,8 expired, 16 had a second recurrence, and 10 were lost to follow up over time. Conclusion: Successful surgery is possible in well selected patients, which in turn can lead to a meaningful progression free and overall survival benefit. Meticulous individualisation of cases should be done keeping in mind the patient's performance status, prior treatment history & toxicity; distribution & extent of disease, and the patient's overall life goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.