Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39149097›Full record

ArticleRSC medicinal chemistry2024

Identification of lysosomotropism using explainable machine learning and morphological profiling cell painting data.

Aishvarya Tandon, Anna Santura, Herbert Waldmann, Axel Pahl, Paul Czodrowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aishvarya TandonDepartment of Chemical Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology Otto-Hahn-Str. 11 Dortmund Germany herbert.waldmann@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de axel.pahl@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6135-6182
Anna SanturaDepartment of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany czodpaul@uni-mainz.de.
Herbert WaldmannDepartment of Chemical Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology Otto-Hahn-Str. 11 Dortmund Germany herbert.waldmann@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de axel.pahl@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9606-7247
Axel PahlDepartment of Chemical Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology Otto-Hahn-Str. 11 Dortmund Germany herbert.waldmann@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de axel.pahl@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2068-7543
Paul CzodrowskiDepartment of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany czodpaul@uni-mainz.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7390-8795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lysosomotropism is a phenomenon of diverse pharmaceutical interests because it is a property of compounds with diverse chemical structures and primary targets. While it is primarily reported to be caused by compounds having suitable lipophilicity and basicity values, not all compounds that fulfill such criteria are in fact lysosomotropic. Here, we use morphological profiling by means of the cell painting assay (CPA) as a reliable surrogate to identify lysosomotropism. We noticed that only 35% of the compound subset with matching physicochemical properties show the lysosomotropic phenotype. Based on a matched molecular pair analysis (MMPA), no key substructures driving lysosomotropism could be identified. However, using explainable machine learning (XML), we were able to highlight that higher lipophilicity, basicity, molecular weight, and lower topological polar surface area are among the important properties that induce lysosomotropism in the compounds of this subset.

Identifiers

PMID39149097
PMCPMC11324048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.