ArticleHeliyon2024
Near-infrared spectroscopy identification method of cashmere and wool fibers based on an optimized wavelength selection algorithm.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cashmere and wool fibers have similar chemical compositions, making them difficult to distinguish based on their absorption peaks and band positions in near-infrared spectroscopy. Existing studies commonly use wavelength selection or feature extraction algorithms to obtain significant spectral features, but traditional algorithms often overlook the correlations between wavelengths, resulting in weak adaptability and local optimum issues. To address this problem, this paper proposes a recognition algorithm based on optimal wavelength selection, which can remove redundant information and make the model effective in capturing patterns and key features of the data. The wavelengths are rearranged by computing the information gain ratio for each wavelength. Then, the sorted wavelengths are grouped based on equal density, which ensures that all wavelengths within each group have equal information and avoids over-focusing on individual groups. Meanwhile, the group genetic algorithm is used to find the wavelengths with highly informative and search optimal grouped combinations, in order to explore the entire spectrum wavelength. Finally, combined with a partial least squares discriminant analysis(PLS-DA) model, the recognition accuracy reached 97.3 %. The results indicate that, compared to traditional methods such as CARS, SPA, and GA, our method effectively reduces redundant information, selects fewer but more informative wavelengths, and improves classification accuracy and model adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.