ArticleHeliyon2024
Semi-supervised learning with flexible threshold for non-intrusive load monitoring.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) can obtain fine-grained power consumption information for individual appliances within the user without installing additional hardware sensors. With the rapid development of the deep learning model, many methods have been utilized to address NILM problems and have achieved enhanced appliance identification performance. However, supervised learning models require a substantial volume of annotated data to function effectively, which is time-consuming, laborious, and difficult to implement in real scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel semi-supervised learning method that combines consistency regularization and pseudo-labels to help identification of appliances with limited labeled data and an abundance of unlabeled data. In addition, given the different learning difficulties of various appliance categories, for example, feature learning is more difficult for multi-state appliances than two-state appliances, the thresholds employed for different appliances are adjusted in a flexible way at each time step so that the informative unlabeled data and their pseudo-labels can be delivered. Experiments have been conducted on publicly available datasets, and the results indicate that the proposed method attains superior appliance identification performance compared to cutting-edge methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.