ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2024
Synchronizing the Nomenclature Surrounding Synchronous Primary Cutaneous Melanomas: A Systematic Review.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple synchronous primary melanomas; A case report.JPRAS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There is little consensus regarding the nomenclature and prognostic implications of synchronous melanomas. Here, we present a case of synchronous cutaneous melanoma and perform a systematic review of similar cases in the literature. Methods: Pubmed and EMBASE databases were queried for relevant English-language articles published from inception until 2023. Cases of "multiple primary cutaneous melanomas" that occurred within a time frame of three months or less were included. Exclusion criteria included non-cutaneous melanomas and cases without specific time intervals or those occurring beyond a three-month period. Data including patient age, sex, risk factors, cutaneous melanoma (CM) anatomic location, CM clinicohistologic features, and prognosis were extracted from relevant articles. Results: Nineteen case reports/series documenting 22 patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) occurring within a three-month interval. Overall, 66 melanomas were diagnosed, with an average of three (SD±2.1, median: 2) per patient. A majority (63%) of patients had one or more risk factors for skin cancer. Subsequent CM found within three-month interval were thinner than the first found (index) CM, more likely to be melanoma Limitations: Limitations to our review included inconsistent reporting in the literature and use of terminology and a limited number of case reports and case series found in the literature. Conclusion: Synchronous primary cutaneous melanomas are a heterogenous collection of terminologies that may limit the ability of dermatologists to accurately diagnose, prognosticate, and treat high-risk patients. Given lack of guidelines, we recommend the use of the term "synchronous" to delineate additional primary cutaneous melanomas found within a three-month interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39148963PMC11324189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.