ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2024
Adversarial Learning for MRI Reconstruction and Classification of Cognitively Impaired Individuals.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced MRI based Alzheimer's diagnosis through ensemble learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mind the Gap: Does Brain Age Improve Alzheimer's Disease Prediction?Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Game theory-inspired deep learning using a generative adversarial network provides an environment to competitively interact and accomplish a goal. In the context of medical imaging, most work has focused on achieving single tasks such as improving image resolution, segmenting images, and correcting motion artifacts. We developed a dual-objective adversarial learning framework that simultaneously 1) reconstructs higher quality brain magnetic resonance images (MRIs) that 2) retain disease-specific imaging features critical for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). We obtained 3-Tesla, T1-weighted brain MRIs of participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI, N=342) and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC, N = 190) datasets. We simulated MRIs with missing data by removing 50% of sagittal slices from the original scans (i.e., diced scans). The generator was trained to reconstruct brain MRIs using the diced scans as input. We introduced a classifier into the GAN architecture to discriminate between stable (i.e., sMCI) and progressive MCI (i.e., pMCI) based on the generated images to facilitate encoding of disease-related information during reconstruction. The framework was trained using ADNI data and externally validated on NACC data. In the NACC cohort, generated images had better image quality than the diced scans (Structural similarity (SSIM) index: 0.553 ± 0.116 versus 0.348 ± 0.108). Furthermore, a classifier utilizing the generated images distinguished pMCI from sMCI more accurately than with the diced scans (F1-score: 0.634 ± 0.019 versus 0.573 ± 0.028). Competitive deep learning has potential to facilitate disease-oriented image reconstruction in those at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.