Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148922›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health2024

The Impact of Rural Environments on Reproductive Autonomy Among Women in Appalachia: A Qualitative Analysis.

Rachel L Wright, Danyelle Kara, K C Buchanan, Cassie Adler, Amanda Pulley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel L WrightDepartment of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Danyelle KaraDepartment of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
K C BuchananDepartment of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Cassie AdlerDepartment of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Amanda PulleyDepartment of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive autonomy encompasses one's ability to make decisions around contraceptive use, pregnancy, and childbirth. An individual's geographic location affects access to a wide range of information and care related to reproductive choice. Individuals in rural areas face additional barriers to reproductive health and decision-making than those in urban areas. This phenomenological qualitative study examined the experiences with and perceptions of reproductive decision-making among women in rural Appalachian communities in the United States. Four themes emerged from the data: autonomy tied to choice, role of religion and church on autonomy and decision-making, navigating limited access to care, and shame. Women should be supported in making reproductive health decisions, and efforts are needed to increase autonomy within reproductive health care and decisions. Sexual health programming within school and other community settings should address shame that often occurs around reproductive health topics, particularly among religious communities.

Indexed as

qualitative methodsreproductive autonomyreproductive decision-makingreproductive healthRural

Identifiers

PMID39148922
PMCPMC11323869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.