ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Genetics of Cardiac Aging Implicate Organ-Specific Variation.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart structure and function change with age, and the notion that the heart may age faster for some individuals than for others has driven interest in estimating cardiac age acceleration. However, current approaches have limited feature richness (heart measurements; radiomics) or capture extraneous data and therefore lack cardiac specificity (deep learning [DL] on unmasked chest MRI). These technical limitations have been a barrier to efforts to understand genetic contributions to age acceleration. We hypothesized that a video-based DL model provided with heart-masked MRI data would capture a rich yet cardiac-specific representation of cardiac aging. In 61,691 UK Biobank participants, we excluded noncardiac pixels from cardiac MRI and trained a video-based DL model to predict age from one cardiac cycle in the 4-chamber view. We then computed cardiac age acceleration as the bias-corrected prediction of heart age minus the calendar age. Predicted heart age explained 71.1% of variance in calendar age, with a mean absolute error of 3.3 years. Cardiac age acceleration was linked to unfavorable cardiac geometry and systolic and diastolic dysfunction. We also observed links between cardiac age acceleration and diet, decreased physical activity, increased alcohol and tobacco use, and altered levels of 239 serum proteins, as well as adverse brain MRI characteristics. We found cardiac age acceleration to be heritable (h2g 26.6%); a genome-wide association study identified 8 loci related to linked to cardiomyopathy (near
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.