ArticleBiomaterials research2024
Evaluation of Integrity of Allogeneic Bone Processed with High Hydrostatic Pressure: A Pilot Animal Study.
Article in Biomaterials research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical comparison of high hydrostatic pressure versus liquid nitrogen treatment for devitalized bone grafts: a fresh porcine model study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Bone Regeneration in Defects Created on Rat Calvaria Grafted with Porcine Xenograft and Synthetic Hydroxyapatite Reinforced with Titanium Particles-A Microscopic and Histological Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Deciphering mechanical cues in the microenvironment: from non-malignant settings to tumor progression.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Comprehensive characterization of cell and tissue responses toward high hydrostatic pressure treatment: Molecular feedback and structural integrity in bone graft processing.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processing of bone allografts with strong acids and γ-sterilization results in decreased biomechanical properties and reduction in osteogenecity and osteoconductivity. High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treatment could be a gentle alternative to processing techniques usually applied. HHP is known to induce devitalization of cancellous bone while preserving biomechanical stability and molecules that induce cell differentiation. Here, a specific HHP protocol for devitalization of cancellous bone was applied to rabbit femoral bone. Allogeneic bone cylinders were subsequently implanted into a defect in the lateral condyles of rabbit femora and were compared to autologous bone grafts. Analysis of bone integration 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively revealed no differences between autografts and HHP-treated allografts regarding the expression of genes characteristic for bone remodeling, showing expression niveous comparable to original bone cylinder. Furthermore, biomechanical properties were evaluated 12 weeks postoperatively. Autografts and HHP-treated allografts both showed a yield strength ranging between 2 and 2.5 MPa and an average bone mass density of 250 mg/cm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.