ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Integrated bioinformatics analysis of nucleotide metabolism based molecular subtyping and biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling heterogeneity in LUAD via multi-omics integration: molecular classification and therapeutic implications.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Predicting neuroblastoma prognosis using machine learning analysis of metabolism-related gene network perturbation.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- TP53-dependent antitumor effects of DHODH Inhibition in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), a predominant subtype of non-small cell lung cancers, continues to challenge treatment outcomes due to its heterogeneity and complex tumor microenvironment (TME). Dysregulation in nucleotide metabolism has been identified as a significant factor in tumorigenesis, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target. Methods: This study analyzed LUAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) using Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) clustering, Weighted Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA), and various machine learning techniques. We investigated the role of nucleotide metabolism in relation to clinical features and immune microenvironment through large-scale data analysis and single-cell sequencing. Using Results: Nucleotide metabolism genes classified LUAD patients into two distinct subtypes with significant prognostic differences. The 'C1' subtype associated with active nucleotide metabolism pathways showed poorer prognosis and a more aggressive tumor phenotype. Furthermore, a nucleotide metabolism-related score (NMRS) calculated from the expression of 28 key genes effectively differentiated between patient outcomes and predicted associations with oncogenic pathways and immune responses. By integrating various immune infiltration algorithms, we delineated the associations between nucleotide metabolism signature genes and the tumor microenvironment, and characterized their distribution differences at the cellular level by analyzing single-cell sequencing dataset related to immunochemotherapy. Finally, we demonstrated the differential expression of the key nucleotide metabolism gene AUNIP acts as an oncogene to promote LUAD cell proliferation and is associated with tumor immune infiltration. Conclusion: The study underscores the pivotal role of nucleotide metabolism in LUAD progression and prognosis, highlighting the NMRS as a valuable biomarker for clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses. Specifically, AUNIP functions as a critical oncogene, offering a promising target for novel treatment strategies in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.