Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148701›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

A comparison of conscious sedation and local anesthesia for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study.

Aysenur Onalan, Erdem Gurkas, Cetin Kursad Akpinar, Özlem Aykaç, Turkan Acar, Bilgehan Acar, Zehra Uysal Kocabaş, Hasan Doğan, Ferhat Balgetir, Sule Kavak Genc and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aysenur OnalanStroke Center, Istanbul Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Erdem GurkasStroke Center, Istanbul Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Cetin Kursad AkpinarStroke Center, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye.
Özlem AykaçStroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Turkan AcarStroke Center, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Bilgehan AcarStroke Center, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Zehra Uysal KocabaşStroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Hasan DoğanStroke Center, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye.
Ferhat BalgetirStroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Sule Kavak GencStroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Ahmet YabalakStroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Atilla Ozcan OzdemirStroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) is a serious health problem in which brain tissue suffers from hypoxic damage due to obstruction in cerebral vessels. Mechanical thrombectomy is a commonly used method in the treatment of these patients. However, the effects of local anesthesia (LA) and conscious sedation (CS) during thrombectomy are still unclear. We evaluated whether there was a relationship between the two anesthesia regimens in terms of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Methods: In this study, a retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the effects of LA and CS used during mechanical thrombectomy in four comprehensive stroke centers among ICVD patients. Patients were divided into the LA group and the CS group. Statistical analysis was performed before and after 1:1 matching under propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The primary outcome measure was an mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were procedure times, recanalization rates, symptomatic and asymptomatic hemorrhage rates, and procedural complications. Results: A total of 193 patients (118 patients with LA and 75 patients with CS) were included in the final analysis before PSM. After 1:1 PSM, 98 patients-49 patients from each group-were included in the study. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the LA- and CS-applied groups ( Conclusion: This study did not reveal the superiority of CS applied during EVT on 90-day mRS, sICH, recanalization rates, or procedural complications. However, the risk of developing hypotension during the CS application was found to be high.

Indexed as

conscious sedationendovascular treatmentlarge vessel occlusionlocal anesthesiapropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID39148701
PMCPMC11326082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.