Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2024

Antenatal care service satisfaction and associated factors among pregnant women at public health facilities of Wogera district, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Asrat Kassaw Belachew, Ayal Debie, Demiss Mulatu Geberu, Abinet Dagnew, Gedamnesh Bitew, Tadesse Mamo Dejene, Agmasie Damtew Walle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antenatal care in Meghalaya - An Uphill Battle: A Community-based Study of Drivers and Barriers of Antenatal Care Utilization.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asrat Kassaw BelachewDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
Ayal DebieDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Demiss Mulatu GeberuDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Abinet DagnewDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
Gedamnesh BitewDepartment of Public Health, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Tadesse Mamo DejeneDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
Agmasie Damtew WalleDepartment of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women's satisfaction with Ante-Natal Care (ANC) is crucial for improving its quality and providing standardized healthcare services. However, studies on pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care and associated factors are limited in Ethiopia, particularly in the study area. Therefore, this study aimed to assess satisfaction and associated factors among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Wogera district. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Wogera district from March to April 2024. A total of 458 pregnant women who attended ANC at health facilities were included in the study. Interviewer -administered structured questionnaire was used to obtain the necessary information for this study and systematic random sampling was used to select the study participants. Multivariable and binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the effect of each independent variable on the outcome (satisfaction). Results: The overall satisfaction of antenatal care services among pregnant women was 92.1% (95% CI: 89.5, 94.5%). The majority (98.3%) of them were satisfied by the provider's greeting and 97.8% were satisfied by the cost of service but pregnant women were less satisfied by waiting time to see the health workers, cleanness of the toilet, and water supply. Satisfaction of pregnant women was associated with housewife occupational status [AOR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.02, 9.15], civil servants occupational status [AOR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.02, 15.85], age ≥25 [AOR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.74], advice on family planning [AOR = 7.29, 95% CI: 3.08, 17.05], one ANC visit [AOR = 3.61, 95% CI: 1.84, 8.74] and the respondents pregnant women who have ≥2 pregnancy [AOR = 4.55, 95% CI: 1.88, 11.03] were the predictors of level of satisfaction. Conclusion: Pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care was high, influenced by factors such as having two or more pregnancies, timing of the first ANC visit, family planning advice, age ≥25 years, and being a housewife or civil servant. Efforts should focus on reducing wait times, ensuring clean water access, and improving latrine hygiene at healthcare facilities to sustain this satisfaction. Specifically, facilities should streamline appointments, maintain safe drinking water sources, and upgrade toilets for better comfort and hygiene.

Indexed as

antenatal careEthiopianorthwestpregnant womensatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39148664
PMCPMC11324434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.