Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2024

Minimum intensity projection of embossed quadrant-detection images for improved photoreceptor mosaic visualisation.

Angelos Kalitzeos, Michel Michaelides, Alfredo Dubra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angelos KalitzeosInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michel MichaelidesInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alfredo DubraByers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Increasing the isoplanatic patch in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopyR01EY032147 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Improving rigor and reproducibility in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopyR01EY031360 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2020 to 2023
$2.3M
Low Latency Eye-Motion CompensationR01EY032669 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032147NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032669Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-confocal split-detection imaging reveals the cone photoreceptor inner segment mosaic in a plethora of retinal conditions, with the potential of providing insight to ageing, disease, and response to treatment processes,

Indexed as

adaptive opticscontrastminimum intensity projectionnon-confocalphotoreceptorsquadrant-detectionsplit-detection

Identifiers

PMID39148554
PMCPMC11325185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.