ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Lymphovenous Bypass as an Alternative Strategy for Managing Phleboedema and Venous Leg Ulcers: Preliminary Results.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lymphovenous Bypass as an Adjunct to Standard Care for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Protocol for a Randomized Assessor-Blinded Superiority Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a common manifestation of chronic venous insufficiency, accounting for up to 70% of all chronic leg ulcers. Patients sustained refractory ulcers and persistent phleboedema even with a combination of different treatment methods. Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) has shown promising results in patients with lymphedema. We hypothesize that LVB could potentially alleviate VLUs and phleboedema, given their symptom similarities with lymphedema. Methods: From May 2021 to June 2023, we prospectively deployed LVB in patients with nonhealing stasis ulcers after 4-week traditional care, or in those with persistent phleboedema despite prior surgery for vein etiologies. Demographics, healing course and recurrence, lymphoscintigraphy, and VLU quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were collected. Results: Thirty-one patients were treated with LVB and additional skin grafting as necessary. Their mean age was 62.6 ± 14.7 years, with male predominance (20, 64.5%), and most patients sustained clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic classification C6 (25, 80.6%). Postoperatively, wound healing and phleboedema decongestion were observed mostly within 2 months. The VLU QoL questionnaire (39.3% response rate) showed improvement in QoL in activities, and psychological and symptom distress aspects. Conclusions: Using LVB for chronic venous insufficiency showed an increase in the success rate of ulcer healing and decompression of the swollen limbs with durable results. Patient-reported outcome measures disclosed the potential benefits of LVB. Large-scale randomized controlled trials and pathophysiological studies are warranted to elucidate its efficacy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.