ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024
Disentangling cobionts and contamination in long-read genomic data using sequence composition.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The recent acceleration in genome sequencing targeting previously unexplored parts of the tree of life presents computational challenges. Samples collected from the wild often contain sequences from several organisms, including the target, its cobionts, and contaminants. Effective methods are therefore needed to separate sequences. Though advances in sequencing technology make this task easier, it remains difficult to taxonomically assign sequences from eukaryotic taxa that are not well represented in databases. Therefore, reference-based methods alone are insufficient. Here, I examine how we can take advantage of differences in sequence composition between organisms to identify symbionts, parasites, and contaminants in samples, with minimal reliance on reference data. To this end, I explore data from the Darwin Tree of Life project, including hundreds of high-quality HiFi read sets from insects. Visualizing two-dimensional representations of read tetranucleotide composition learned by a variational autoencoder can reveal distinct components of a sample. Annotating the embeddings with additional information, such as coding density, estimated coverage, or taxonomic labels allows rapid assessment of the contents of a dataset. The approach scales to millions of sequences, making it possible to explore unassembled read sets, even for large genomes. Combined with interactive visualization tools, it allows a large fraction of cobionts reported by reference-based screening to be identified. Crucially, it also facilitates retrieving genomes for which suitable reference data are absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.