Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148142›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2024

Social environment influences microbiota and potentially pathogenic bacterial communities on the skin of developing birds.

Ester Martínez-Renau, Antonio M Martín-Platero, Kasun H Bodawatta, Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel Martínez-Bueno, Michael Poulsen, Juan José Soler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ester Martínez-RenauDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), 04120, Almería, Spain. esmart@eeza.csic.es.
Antonio M Martín-PlateroDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Kasun H BodawattaNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Manuel Martín-VivaldiUnidad Asociada (CSIC): Coevolución: Cucos, Hospedadores y Bacterias Simbiontes, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Martínez-BuenoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Michael PoulsenSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Juan José SolerDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), 04120, Almería, Spain. jsoler@eeza.csic.es.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CGL2017-83103-PMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación CGL2017-83103-PMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación PRE2018-085378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal bacterial symbionts are established early in life, either through vertical transmission and/or by horizontal transmission from both the physical and the social environment, such as direct contact with con- or heterospecifics. The social environment particularly can influence the acquisition of both mutualistic and pathogenic bacteria, with consequences for the stability of symbiotic communities. However, segregating the effects of the shared physical environment from those of the social interactions is challenging, limiting our current knowledge on the role of the social environment in structuring bacterial communities in wild animals. Here, we take advantage of the avian brood-parasite system of Eurasian magpies (Pica pica) and great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) to explore how the interspecific social environment (magpie nestlings developing with or without heterospecifics) affects bacterial communities on uropygial gland skin.

resultsWe demonstrated interspecific differences in bacterial community compositions in members of the two species when growing up in monospecific nests. However, the bacterial community of magpies in heterospecific nests was richer, more diverse, and more similar to their cuckoo nest-mates than when growing up in monospecific nests. These patterns were alike for the subset of microbes that could be considered core, but when looking at the subset of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera, cuckoo presence reduced the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera on magpies.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the role of social interactions in shaping the assembly of the avian skin bacterial communities during the nestling period, as exemplified in a brood parasite-host system.

Indexed as

Avian skin microbiomeBacterial communityBrood parasitismEurasian magpieGreat spotted cuckooSocial transmission

Identifiers

PMID39148142
PMCPMC11325624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.