ReviewDiagnostic pathology2024
Clinicopathological diagnosis of Lennert lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in Diagnostic pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLennert lymphoma (LL) is a variant of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), also known as a lymphoepithelioid variant of PTCL. Because of the rarity and lack of clear-cut diagnostic criteria, LL is susceptible tomisdiagnosis. Although previously diagnosed with LL might be reclassified and evaluated with the advent of of molecular and/or genetic findings, cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry are still the key to give rise to correct diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a patient who was diagnosed as LL based on cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry. Routine stain (Hematoxlin and Eosin-H&E) revealed tumor cells were mainly small to medium-sized CD4(+) T cells, the CD8 +/TIA-1 + cytotoxic cells were less minority, no expressions of follicle helper T cell markers (CD10, BCL6, PD1, CXCL13, ICOS) or CD21(+) hyperplastic FDC network, or proliferation of high edndothelial venules were noted; however, numerous epithelioid histiocytes are noted in the background and scattered EBV(+) cells were also present. The patient was achieved complete remission after six courses of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone regimen. She was followed for 5 years without recurrence or progression.
conclusionsClassic LL is not difficult to diagnose by cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry, and the mutation profiles can be helpful to distinguish LL from other lymphomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.