Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148043›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

Abated crowding by fast-tracking the Throughput component of the ED for patients in no need of hospitalization with competency managed personnel.

Jesper Juul Larsen, Halfdan Lauridsen, Laurits Wullum Gundersen, Birgit Falk Riecke, Thomas A Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesper Juul LarsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Halfdan LauridsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Laurits Wullum GundersenDepartment of Digitalization and Analysis, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Birgit Falk RieckeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Thomas A SchmidtDepartment of Emergency Medicine, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark. thomas.schmidt@regionh.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding is a major patient safety concern and has a negative impact on healthcare systems and healthcare providers. We hypothesized that it would be feasible to control crowding by employing a multifaceted approach consisting of systematically fast-tracking patients who are mostly not in need of a hospital stay as assessed by an initial nurse and treated by decision competent physicians.

methodsData from 120,901 patients registered in a secondary care ED from the 4t

resultsBefore and after ED changes crowding of 130% amounted to 123.8 h and 19.3 h in the latter. This is a difference of -104.6 ± 23.9 h with a 95% CI of -159.9 to -49.3, Δ% -84 (p = 0.002). There was the same amount of patients / day amounting to 135.8 and 133.5 patients / day Δ% = -1.7 patients 95% CI -6.3 to 1.6 (p = 0.21). There was no change in readmittances within 72 h before and after changes amounting to 9.0% versus 9.5%, Δ% = 0.5, 95%, CI -0.007 to 1.0 (p > 0.052).

conclusionIt appears feasible to abate crowding with unchanged patient admission and without an increase in readmittances by fast-track assessment and treatment of patients who are not in need of hospitalization.

Indexed as

CrowdingEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedCrowdingElectronic health recordEmergency DepartmentEmergency outpatient incident registration (EOIR)SAP Web Intelligence tool

Identifiers

PMID39148043
PMCPMC11328428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.