Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148020›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2024

Decoding IBS: a machine learning approach to psychological distress and gut-brain interaction.

Astri J Lundervold, Julie E Billing, Birgitte Berentsen, Gülen A Lied, Elisabeth K Steinsvik, Trygve Hausken, Arvid Lundervold

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04296552 (Study Protocol of the Bergen Brain-gut-microbiota-axis Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04296552 naunknown statusnot on this map

Study Protocol of the Bergen Brain-gut-microbiota-axis Study: a Prospective Case-report Characterization and Dietary Intervention Study to Evaluate the Effects of Microbiota Alterations on Cognition and Anatomical and Functional Brain Connectivity in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Gastrointestinal DisordersArmsDietary lowFODMAP intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The road to Rome IV and beyond: Evolution, refinements and future considerations for the Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precision neuropsychology in the area of AI.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Astri J LundervoldDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Universtity of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway. astri.lundervold@uib.no.
Julie E BillingDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Universtity of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway.
Birgitte BerentsenNational Center for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Gülen A LiedNational Center for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Elisabeth K SteinsvikNational Center for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Trygve HauskenNational Center for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, 5021, Norway.
Arvid LundervoldDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway.

Funding

Helse Vest's Research Funding HV912243Research Council of Norway grant ID FRIMED- BIO276010The Research Council of Norway 294594Trond Mohn Research Foundation BFS2018TMT0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a diagnosis defined by gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms like abdominal pain and changes associated with defecation. The condition is classified as a disorder of the gut-brain interaction (DGBI), and patients with IBS commonly experience psychological distress. The present study focuses on this distress, defined from reports of fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, and performance on cognitive tests. The aim was to investigate the joint contribution of these features of psychological distress in predicting IBS versus healthy controls (HCs) and to disentangle clinically meaningful subgroups of IBS patients.

methodsIBS patients (

resultsThe explorative data analysis showed that the group of IBS patients obtained significantly more severe scores than HCs on all included measures, with the strongest pairwise correlation between fatigue and a quality measure of sleep disturbances. The supervised classification model correctly predicted belongings to the IBS group in 80% of the cases in a test set of unseen data. Two methods for calculating feature importance in the test set gave mental and physical fatigue and anxiety the strongest weights. An unsupervised procedure with

conclusionThe results showed that psychological distress is an integral component of IBS symptomatology. The study should inspire future longitudinal studies to further dissect clinical patterns of IBS to improve the assessment and personalized treatment for this and other patient groups defined as disorders of the gut-brain interaction. The project is registered at https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04296552 20/05/2019.

Indexed as

AnxietyBrain-Gut AxisDepressionFatigueIrritable Bowel SyndromeMachine LearningPsychological DistressAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSleep Wake DisordersStress, PsychologicalCognitionDepression-anxietyFatigueFeature importanceIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS)Machine learningSleep disturbances

Identifiers

PMID39148020
PMCPMC11325751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.