Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39147967›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Imaging-Based Analysis of Cell-Cell Contact-Dependent Migration in Dictyostelium.

Taihei Fujimori, Hidenori Hashimura, Satoshi Sawai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taihei FujimoriDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Hidenori HashimuraGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi SawaiGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. cssawai@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-cell interaction mediated by secreted and adhesive signaling molecules forms the basis of the coordinated cell movements (i.e., collective cell migration) observed in developing embryos, regenerating tissues, immune cells, and metastatic cancer. Decoding the underlying input/output rules at the single-cell level, however, remains a challenge due to the vast complexity in the extracellular environments that support such cellular behaviors. The amoebozoa Dictyostelium discoideum uses GPCR-mediated chemotaxis and cell-cell contact signals mediated by adhesion proteins with immunoglobulin-like folds to form a collectively migrating slug. Coordinated migration and repositioning of the cells in this relatively simple morphogenetic system are driven strictly by regulation of actin cytoskeleton by these signaling factors. Its unique position in the eukaryotic tree of life outside metazoa points to basic logics of tissue self-organization that are common across taxa. Here, we describe a method to reconstitute intercellular contact signals and the resulting cell polarization using purified adhesion proteins. In addition, a protocol using a microfluidic chamber is laid out where one can study how the cell-cell contact signal and chemoattractant signals, when simultaneously presented, are interpreted. Quantitative image analysis for obtaining cell morphology features is also provided. A similar approach should be applicable to study other collectively migrating cells.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell MovementChemotaxisDictyosteliumCell AdhesionCell PolaritySignal TransductionCell-cell contactChemotaxisCollective cell migrationImage analysisMicrofluidicsProtein purification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.