ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2024
Profiling Cell-Free DNA from Malignant Pleural Effusion for Oncogenic Driver Mutations in Patients with Treatment-Naive Stage IV Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multi-Biofluid Approaches for cftDNA and cftRNA Biomarker Detection: Advances in Early Cancer Detection and Monitoring.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionComprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of non-small-cell lung cancer specimens can identify oncogenic driver mutations and their corresponding targeted therapies. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping is easy to perform; however, false negatives cannot be overlooked. We explored malignant pleural effusion (MPE), a rich source of cfDNA, as a non-inferior alternative to tumor tissues for genotyping.
methodsWe conducted a prospective trial including 39 patients with newly diagnosed stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who presented with MPE. Tissue tests matching hotspot variants, including EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, were compared with the AlphaLiquid100 of PE-cfDNA.
resultsAmong the 39 PE-cfDNA samples successfully sequenced, 32 (82.1%) had a PE cell-block tumor content of < 10%. Standard tissue or cell-block testing for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 identified 20 mutations (51.3%), whereas PE cfDNA identified 25 mutations (64.1%). Five EGFR mutations were observed in PE cfDNA but not in Cobas EGFR owing to coverage or insufficient tumor content issues. The overall rate of oncogenic mutations identified in the PE cfDNA was 92.3%, and the mutation distribution was as follows: even with a very low cfDNA input, high detection rates could be achieved. Otherwise, most patients harbored co-mutations. Comparison of pleural fluid NGS with traditional testing revealed differences in accuracy. We also followed up with patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations who had a treatment response rate of 97.2% after 3 months.
conclusionsGenotyping of MPE supernatant cfDNA is feasible in clinical practice, in addition to plasma and tumor testing, to improve diagnostic yield and extend patients' benefit from targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.