ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma evaluated by NGS: molecular landscape and efficacy of targeted therapies.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the molecular profile of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in guiding therapy in patients with mUC and the outcomes of DNA-matched treatments recommended by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board (MMTB).
methodsThis was a single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of adult patients with mUC included in an ongoing trial that aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of NGS for solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed for each patient, most of them using the Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay. Genomic results were discussed during MMTB meetings.
resultsWe included 43 patients with mUC treated with platinum-based combinations and immunotherapy. Twenty-five patients (58.1%; 95% CI 43.4-72.9) had at least one tumor pathogenic alteration. The MMTB classified 16 (48.5%) of the 33 tumor pathogenic alterations found in our real-world cohort of mUC patients as ESCAT I, which is the maximum grade of actionability. After excluding patients who were not candidates for targeted therapies, the MMTB provided guidance on matched therapy for seven patients. Among these patients, three achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 42.9%, a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (95% CI 6.7-7.9) and a median overall survival of 10.9 months (95% CI 2.4-19.5).
conclusionsWe recommend that all patients with mUC undergo NGS at diagnosis given the high percentage of patients with pathogenic alterations in our real-world cohort and the efficacy data of patients treated with targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39147936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.