Trial reportPediatric research2025
Control of breathing in preterm infants on incubator oxygen or nasal cannula oxygen.
Trial report in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prematurity-Related Ventilatory Control: Role in Respiratory Outcomes
Prematurity-Related Ventilatory Control (PRE-VENT): Role in Respiratory Outcomes Clinical Research Centers (CRC) - Specific Aim 3
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncubator oxygen may improve respiratory stability in preterm infants compared with nasal cannula oxygen.
methodsSingle center randomized trial of infants <29 weeks' gestation on supplemental oxygen at ≥32 weeks' postmenstrual age. Infants were crossed-over every 24 hours for 96 hours between incubator oxygen and nasal cannula ≤1.0 L/kg/min. We measured episodes of intermittent hypoxemia (oxygen saturations (SpO
resultsWe enrolled 25 infants with a gestational age of 26 weeks 4 days±15 days (mean ± SD) and birth weight 805 ± 202 grams. There were no differences in episodes of intermittent hypoxemia, bradycardia, or cerebral hypoxemia between groups. There were fewer episodes of abdominal hypoxemia <40% ≥10 seconds with incubator oxygen compared with nasal cannula (132 ± 130 versus 158 ± 125; p < 0.01). Time with SpO
conclusionThere was no difference in intermittent hypoxemia between incubator and nasal cannula oxygen among preterm infants on supplemental oxygen. Infants had higher levels of carbon dioxide while on incubator oxygen, which may have improved some measures of respiratory stability. CLINCALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT03333174 and NCT03174301. IMPACT STATEMENT: In this randomized cross-over trial of preterm infants on supplemental oxygen, incubator oxygen did not decrease episodes of intermittent hypoxemia compared with nasal cannula oxygen. Incubator oxygen reduced time with oxygen saturations less than 85%, reduced abdominal hypoxemia, and increased carbon dioxide levels. Differences in measures of respiratory stability on incubator oxygen may be partly due to higher carbon dioxide levels compared with nasal cannula oxygen. The mode of supplemental oxygen administration may impact control of breathing in preterm infants through its effect on hypopharyngeal oxygen stability and carbon dioxide levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.